Skip to main content

The Kitsch of Avant Garde

"Kitsch" and "Avant Garde" have had widely expanded definitions in the growing years. The roots of such terms may have indeed started at opposite ends of a cultural or societal spectrum, but more and more in the 21st century, the two have intersected; the intersections at which such subcultures as Twee and Hipster spawned from. Such terms have indeed shaped both mainstream and counterculture in the 20th and 21st centuries, but no one has attempted to compose a thorough critique of such terms, since the 1939 essay "Avant Garde and Kitsch" by Clement Greenberg.

The piece argues that kitsch comes from a desire to appreciate culture by those who could not digest the more high fluent culture of the then aristocracy.  "To fill the demand of a new market, a new commodity was devised: ersatz culture, kitsch, destined for those who, insensible to the values of genuine culture, are hungry nevertheless for the diversion that only some sort of culture can provide." Greenberg is brutal to both avant garde and kitsch, claiming that avant garde has a preoccupation by the medium and action for which they are creating, and, also, in their elitism have greatly slimmed their audience, perhaps making the innovation and profoundness they pride themselves on, soon impossible to achieve. The latter half of the essay focuses on kitsch, which, in Greenberg's view, has a commercial value and universality that gives it a superficiality. Kitsch, also, takes away the value in the dichotomy of cultural tastes and differentiation. Greenberg deems kitsch overly manufactured and avant garde overly genuine, to the point where cutting-edge art focuses solely on purity. This makes Greenberg's argument not one of taste, so much as one of authenticity.

Greenberg's essay is, undeniably, outdated; however, from a historical standpoint, it still holds value. Kitsch and avant garde were fairly new terms in Greenberg's time. Their definitions have changed, but have their roots in what it is described in "Avant Garde and Kitsch". Perhaps the best parallel between  Greenberg's times and ours is found in Robert Atkins's Artspeak: "He [Greenberg] defined kitsch broadly to include jazz, advertising, Hollywood movies, and commercial illustration--all of which are generally regarded now as popular culture rather than kitsch. Although Greenberg's definition of kitsch is overly expansive, his analysis of how it operates remains apt. Today kitsch is most often used to denigrate objects considered to be in bad taste." Kitsch is either in bad taste because of its sentimentality or its grotesque appearance, on occasion because of its grotesque sentimentality. It should also be mentioned, however, that kitsch has lost the commercial value Greenberg describes.  It is just as likely to be handmade as mass produced.

Kitsch has been possessed by lower class patrons, though in more recent years, with the birth of white elephant gifts and camp, kitsch has been enjoyed by people of higher class by means of an ironic approach, to which the viewer pokes fun at both the creator and sincere enjoyer of such pieces. Is this ethical? Another manifestation of intellectual bullying or elitism? One might ask these questions with the given information. At this point in the history of kitsch, it is being (insincerely) enjoyed by the avant garde. It is true that this is indeed disrespectful to both buyers and artists of such work. It is at this point that the avant garde loses its sincerity and authenticity that Greenberg discusses. The avant garde, once refusing to either conform to the upper class, nor the more radical bohemians, in favor of something entirely new, now, as Greenberg perhaps predicted, has run out of their groundbreaking innovations and resorts to the satirical dissecting of art genuinely enjoyed by others. This is the era of hipsterism.

In recent years, however, avant garde has perhaps managed to redeem itself by turning to the overly-sentimental world of kitsch, once again through a tactic unsuspected--finding meaning in it. Cross stitch pillows and velvet Elvis paintings are put in a new light, if the viewer sees them as a labor of love. This is the age old adage: it is what you make of it. People are now able to enjoy both Marina Abramovic and Hello Kitty alike. We embark on a new era, one filled with fandoms and lolcats. This is the welcomed age of The Kitsch of Avant Garde.

Sources:
Greenberg, Clement. "Avant Garde and Kitsch." Partisan Review. 1939.

Atkins, Robert. "Artspeak." Abbeville Press. 1990.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Steps to healing and solastalgia.

It's quite amazing how your inner landscape changes after abuse and trauma.  Things that never used to bother me, or never even entered my awareness are now triggers sending off anxiety responses and distress.  The intensity of these varies and even though I am aware of them and have good protective strategies in place, frequently they go where they want to go as happens in trauma response.  Your hypothalamus hijacks your brain and off goes your heart rate, blood pressure, cognitive function etc.  If ever you find yourself in the company of someone with severe anxiety or experiencing a traumatic trigger please don't expect them to snap out of it or just get over it, the healing process doesn't work like that. They are not being dramatic or silly, nor is it something they have control over.  Be patient, help them to ease their anxiety and fear by using their senses.  Smelling the smells around them, feeling the breeze on their skin. Noticing the texture of their shirt, the …

a heart who's love is innocent

Lately I've been thinking about the difference between being alone and being lonely. I actually don't like the label of introvert, especially the way it's used nowadays online. People that I've encountered online who identify as introverts seem to have swell heads and think that wanting to be alone sometimes counts as a personality. Or they're incredibly misanthropic and think hating people will make them popular online. Obviously this is a generalization, and I'm sure there are some wonderful people in online introvert communities, I just never felt comfortable calling myself part of them, especially lately. I've also been questioning the usefulness of labels-- I think pretty much everyone has introverted and extroverted tendencies.


I am a pretty solitary person, though, and I've always been okay with that, until recently. In high school, I was hardly a party animal, but I had friends that I could go get coffee with and study with and make flower crowns…

lip gloss and cherry pop

Lately I've been thinking a lot about the ways in which my online persona differs from how I act in real life. I think that my demeanor is mostly the same-- I'd like to think that my online friends and my real life friends view me as a kind and intelligent cheese lover. I've met several online acquaintances in real life and they don't seem at all surprised by my mannerisms or anything. But, strangely, I think I'm more open and expressive online. It sounds strange to say "I'm more myself online than I am in real life," because, like most people, my digital life is heavily curated. But I do think that, as someone who suffers from social anxiety, the internet has allowed me to share my thoughts more freely without the intimidation of talking to someone face-to-face.


My (real-life) friend and I are starting a silly podcast-- it's mostly just us talking and we still don't know if we for sure want to make it public or just record conversations for ou…